Air Force Academy Selections

Percentages matter, but the overall intent remains -- be your best!

Often, my students focus on the selection 'weightings' used by the Air Force Academy and the other US service academies. My advice is simple: maximize all that you can. The three main areas are: academics, athletics and activities. With an added focus to seek leadership opportunities in all three areas.

But let's explore each area and how the 'percentages' impact your application to the US Air Force Academy. My comments and advice apply as well to the other service academies: the US Military Academy, the US Naval Academy, the US Coast Guard Academy and the US Merchant Marine Academy.

As noted in both illustrations, the following weighting is used by USAFA to determine the whole person scores used to compare candidates:

• Academics - 50%

• Admissions Board Review - 20%

• Extracurriculars - 20%

• Candidate Interview - 5%

• Candidate Fitness - 5%

ACADEMICS

Half of a candidate's whole person score (WPS) is based on academic performance, including grades and standardized test scores like the SAT or ACT. These scores are one indicator of readiness for the Air Force Academy's rigorous academic environment. The introduction of the Classic Learning Test (CLT) as an alternative assessment allows candidates to demonstrate their academic abilities in a different way, offering more flexibility in showcasing their preparedness.

Additionally, AFA Admissions evaluates the 'quality' of a candidate's academic record, emphasizing not just grades but also the rigor of courses taken. Successful candidates typically engage in challenging classes, such as Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) courses, which prepare them for the Academy's demanding coursework. Candidates should complete the recommended academic courses, including four years of science, English, and math, to build a strong foundation in critical thinking and analytical skills essential for success in the military.

To increase their chances of admission, candidates should review the academic recommendations on the service academies' admissions websites. These resources provide insights into specific course requirements that can improve a candidate's profile. After reviewing, candidates should take steps to incorporate any missing courses into their schedules, such as enrolling in advanced classes or summer programs.

EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITES

This composite 'category' is weighted at 20% and consists of the different extracurricular activities in which you participate, reflecting not just your interests but also your dedication and ability to manage your time effectively. Extracurricular activities are crucial as they showcase your commitment to personal development and community involvement, which are highly valued traits in candidates for service academies. Activities, such as Scouting, the Civil Air Patrol, school clubs, and church youth groups offer unique growth opportunities valued by the AF Academy and other service academies.

Additionally, great candidates should also play one or more sports, as physical fitness and teamwork are essential components of military training and service. About 80% of cadets and midshipmen were varsity athletes in school. Within all of these activities, whether they are community service projects, academic clubs, or sports teams, it is crucial to seek engagement opportunities that go beyond mere participation. Look for additional responsibilities and strive to earn a leadership role within these organizations. Serving as a team captain, club president, or troop leader not only enhances your qualifications for any of the service academies but also demonstrates your ability to lead, inspire, and motivate others.

Overall, the service academies value 'quality' over 'quantity.' It is not the number of clubs or activities you can list on your résumé that matters most, but rather the depth of your involvement and the impact you made within those activities. As an AF Admission Liaison Officer (ALO), I was never impressed with someone who merely participated in 10 different clubs (or similar résumé details) without demonstrating real engagement. I wanted to hear about 'what' you did inside a club, how you shouldered responsibilities, and the specific leadership roles you undertook.

ALO INTERVIEW

Every candidate will undergo an interview with an "Evaluator" ALO. This ALO will be located in another state outside the one in which you reside. S/he will conduct the interview via video link, such as Zoom or FaceTime. All candidates have a local ALO that is available for assistance and questions; however, the "Mentor ALO" does not impact the 5% weighting derived from the E-ALO interview.

An important aspect that frequently surpasses the minimal 5% impact is the comments and impressions documented by the ALO. The AFA review board will take note of these comments and examine your application for additional impactful details. I will elaborate on this in the review-board section.

As you can imagine, I spend quite a bit of time with my students preparing for this (and other) interviews. A candidate should be prepared to respond to questions, such as "why" you are pursing an appointment, your plans for a career and the academic interests that you will likely pursue at the Academy. What's more, be prepared to discuss "how" you make a difference inside your different clubs, teams and other groups.

CANDIDATE FITNESS ASSESSMENT

Every service academy requires a fitness assessment. All, but the US Coast Guard Academy, use the six-event CFA. Candidates must pass the CFA to earn an appointment. However, I recommend focusing on achieving "average" numbers on each event (as published on the USAFA Admissions website) to allow you to achieve a strong CFA score. Although it only counts 5%, its impact (like the ALO interview) may very well carry much more weight with the review board.

ADMISSION REVIEW BOARD

The review board plays a crucial role in the selection process, comprising a weighted contribution of 20% toward the overall score consideration for each candidate applying for admission. This percentage reflects the significance of the Review Board's evaluation in determining a candidate's suitability for acceptance. At the conclusion of the application process, the Review Board, which consists of the Selection Panel and then the Selection Board, undertakes a comprehensive assessment of each candidate's records and their resulting Whole Person Score (WPS). This evaluation involves a meticulous review of all components of the candidate's record, ensuring that no aspect of their application is overlooked.

During this evaluative process, the board members delve into various elements that contribute to the candidate's overall score. They examine the Interview Evaluation provided by the Admissions Liaison Officer (ALO), which offers insights into the candidate's personal attributes and communication skills. Additionally, they scrutinize the essays submitted by the candidate. These personal statements ideally reflect the candidate's motivations, aspirations, and unique experiences. Teacher Evaluations are another critical component, providing perspectives from educators who can attest to the candidate's academic performance and character. If the candidate has submitted Optional Recommendations, these are also considered, as they can highlight additional strengths or accomplishments that may not be fully captured in other parts of the application. Furthermore, the CFA results are taken into account, providing a quantitative measure of the candidate's physical capabilities and readiness for the rigorous demands of the military.

The board particularly values consistency across the candidate's record, as it paints a cohesive picture of their experiences and achievements. For instance, if a candidate is a dedicated gymnast, one of their essays might detail their commitment to the sport, illustrating the discipline and perseverance required to excel. An optional recommendation from the athlete's coach could further emphasize their leadership qualities and teamwork skills. Additionally, the ALO might note that the candidate, serving as the team captain, took the initiative to organize team-building activities that fostered a more inclusive culture within the team. Such consistency across various elements of the application can significantly enhance the candidate's overall appeal, leading to a more favorable evaluation by the panel. Ultimately, the panel will assign a score based on their assessments, which is typically reviewed and finalized by the chair before being combined into a composite score that reflects the candidate's overall standing.

Following the completion of the nomination process in early February, appointments are awarded by a selection board. This board carefully considers the Whole Person Score of candidates to determine who will receive an appointment. It's important to note that without a nomination, a candidate, regardless of how impressive their WPS may be, will not be eligible for an appointment.

Despite the different component weighting for an appointment -- Academics at 50%, Admissions Board Review at 20%, Extracurriculars at 20%, Candidate Interview at 5% and Candidate Fitness at 5% -- a candidate should focus on doing their very best in each area. And in the end, your best is all you can ask!

[ I would welcome a chance to discuss details with you. I offer coaching services to pace and prepare you (and your parents!) for the entire Academy application process -- working with you to optimize all aspects of your application. Contact me at chris@cbbrechin.com, 503.515.7406 or complete my contact form on the home page. ]